The following article was written on May 5th, by Jerónimo Pruijn, Executive Director of the Foundation of Small Producers (FUNDEPPO)

Rosa Guaman, President of the SPP, and other members voting at the Annual Meeting in Panama City, May 2015
There is no better day than today, May 5th, to share some words about the Small Producers’ Symbol (SPP, for its Spanish Acronym). I was born in Holland, and on May 5th in Holland, we celebrate Liberation Day, the day the occupation ended during World War II.
The SPP is also a symbol of liberation: the liberation of small producers of the global South.
The SPP was given birth the 26th of March 2006. Of course, a period of pregnancy came first. To fully understand the origin of the SPP, it is important to go back to the beginnings of fair trade. The first fair trade label, Max Havelaar was a result of a search by the Mexican small producers’ coffee cooperative, UCIRI, for better access to preferential, solidarity markets, in close collaboration with the Solidaridad Foundation in Holland. Fair trade soon turned out to be an important tool and ‘motor’ for small producers’ organizations that were in the process of consolidating their organizational and entrepreneurial efforts in different countries of the South. We should not forget that some of these producers’ organizations have their origin in the eighties, others even in the seventies or the sixties of the last century.
As a result of the rapid progress and positive impact of fair trade, in the 1990s, producers’ organizations of Latin America involved in fair trade, but also from Africa and from Asia, started organizing or strengthening existing international networks of producers’ organizations involved in fair trade. In the beginning, these networks were mainly coffee producers, but soon also came small honey, fruit and other producer’ organizations. In the case of Latin America, these international networks were mainly promoted and maintained by the coops themselves, without any external support. This process ended up in the constitution of CLAC, the Latin American and Caribbean Network of Small Fair Trade Producers, in 2004.
By then, discussions around the content and parameters of the concept of fair trade were starting to become more and more common. At the start of fair trade, at the end of the eighties, both producers as well as consumers, viewed the idea of fair trade as equivalent to that of supporting small producers’ organizations. By the time the CLAC was created, this equivalence (that fair trade was synonomous with producer support) was no longer that clear. In some new products, such as bananas, the fair trade concept was extended to private plantations, meant to benefit their workers. On the other hand, fair trade´s success also had attracted the attention of multinational companies which before had not shown any interest in this model. The broadening of the concept went along with the growth of the market for small producers. Producers were happy with this growth of opportunities, but also worried about the role small producers’ organizations played in the concept and decision-making of fair trade.
The SPP was launched as an effort to identify small producers’ organizations in the wider movement of fair trade. At the same time it was a next step in the appropriation process of the supply chain. Producers’ organizations have always been looking for ways to increase their influence and control in the different stages of the supply chain, aiming to maximize the benefits for the small producers and their communities. Producers’ organizations had been increasing their capacities, partly with the stimulating power of fair trade, to sell their products more professionally, looking for the improvement of quality as well as the increase of added values. More and more producer organizations started to get involved in the production of end-products for local markets. The SPP was meant to help these organizations to promote their products, both in the local markets, as well in the international markets, as being exclusively from small producers’ organizations.
In the beginning, the SPP was not launched as a certification system, just as a distinction for small producers’ organizations within the fair trade movement. As traders and also producer’s organizations started to request the active use of the label, feasibility studies were done, with positive results. The main expectations of the producers’ organizations by that time was that it should identify themselves; be an accessible system, in terms of costs and of simplicity; it should be adaptable to the circumstances of each and every producer organization; it should not be prescriptive in terms of detailed compliance criteria; it should be applicable to both local and global markets and it should be credible. Finally the development of the SPP ended up in the launch of a full-fledged standards and certification system at the beginning of 2011.
Currently, around sixty thousand families of around 60 small producers’ coops are certified, from 13 Latin American countries and Indonesia. Volumes of purchases and sales on the markets have been increasing steadily, both in the Northern markets, as well as in the local markets of producers’ countries. We expect this year to have the first couple of African producers-organizations participating.
What makes the SPP different from other fair and sustainable trade labels?
This is a very relevant question in the context of an avalanche of labels around the world. In the very first place, it is a 100% producer-owned initiative. It was launched in 2006 as the ‘open home’ of small producers, a place in which they can build their own future, a place where they have control and where they can receive friends. The producers are the ones who have developed and still fully steer the SPP.
It is a place where they can build their ideal world, a different economy and society, with the help and solidarity of friends. As it is built by their own efforts, it is being built and expanded step by step, guaranteeing the foundation is strong enough to carry the weight of the building when it grows. Producers decide on standards and carry the full responsibility of what they decide. In the SPP, nobody tells producers what´s good for them; they know what they need and what´s reasonable and they fight for it. At the SPP, producers do not have a share in decision-making, they make the decisions, and, wisely involve their trade-partners in the decision making process. The SPP as the incarnation of the empowerment of small producers, the ultimate goal and result of fair trade.
Recently the new General Assembly of the SPP, run by the Foundation of Small Producers (FUNDEPPO) was established and a new board was appointed. The board is composed of six small producers’ representatives from 6 different countries and of three representatives of committed traders, also from different countries and continents. This way the SPP brings the producers and the traders together to make trade and consumer-involvement possible, without anybody standing in between. The newly appointed Chair is Mrs. Rosa Guamán, the indigenous leader or an herbs-producing co-operative from Ecuador. She is an example of the process of liberation of indigenous people in producer countries as a result of an historic struggle and somebody who has a lot to show and teach to the world about the importance of creating a more inclusive and equal economy and society.
The SPP is about building a different and better reality ‘down-top’, not ‘top-down’. Small producers increasingly feel the menace of the tendency of many labels to become some kind of wishing list of perfect practices and behavior, politically, socially and ethically. Expectancies towards producers have become lists of strict requirements and high thresholds. Criteria are imposed from the North on the South, on an increasing amount of topics. This without considering all the costs involved in fulfilling all these criteria. Democratic small producers are put to compete with huge private production companies with strong hierarchical structures and which logically have lower production costs.
Fair trade should always recognize the multiples values and contributions of the work of democratic small producers and their organizations. The SPP makes these values visible, such as building stronger local economies, more democratic societies and fighting climate change. Values which have strong direct and indirect impacts, even on the wellbeing of consumers far away. The producers of the SPP look for traders, consumers and professionals that believe in the importance and capacities of small producer’s organizations and fair trade as a model of sustainable and self-managed development and inclusionary processes.
At the SPP we want to invite people to build a better world together, as a joint responsibility, not only as the responsibility of producers.
The minimum prices and compensations for organic production are key for the SPP-producers. The SPP prices are probably the highest in the market, but this is the only way fair and sustainable trade can really offer the impact and changes it promises. The producers of the SPP want to show the world what their work and lives are worth and have decided not to bargain away their dignity ever again. They know it is not easy and that it will be a long and probably endless struggle. But that is what liberation is all about, to be able to take responsibility for your own life and future.
This article is one of the first to clearly explain how and why the Símbolo de Pequeños Productores is so much more than a fair trade certification system, but a historic initiative by small producers themselves to transform north-south relationships through trade, to share their values and perspectives with consumers in order to creatively and dynamically address global issues of economic and social justice as well as urgent environmental concerns.
That is what makes the SPP an authentic movement among small producers of the south; it is not a construct or policy imposed by an agency or think-tank; it is not a “poverty-reduction program” or a vector for “development”; it is a home-grown appeal to decency and common sense, representing the voice, the values and the leadership of those at the bottom of the global social hierarchy. Therein lie the seeds of their true “liberation” and empowerment, for the benefit of all…
1. it is natural that public opinion should answer such questions we are also democratic countries?
the problem is that as you move in global warming will must be used Earth’s temperature lowered devices who will takes the responsibility?
how we are moving into global warming will be higher costs whose money will be paid these costs?
at what price these inventions will be traded?
whose pocket money will go?
…………………..
how temperature should be lowered?
probably until the cycle normality, removing the negative effects of human society?
much of public information is full with monidene news for “suckers” and “clevers guys” plays the cards on the back?
the problem is that as you move in global warming will must be used Earth’s temperature lowered devices
who will takes the responsibility?
how we are moving into global warming will be higher costs
whose money will be paid these costs?
2. the invention was belonged to the craftsman in direct connection with heaven, with God, it was stolen to the human society, from God (because God means all people not just those “privileged” financial) through taxes …….. through an entire bureaucratic-financial system burdening manufacturers, small manufacturers having not access to inventions,…………….., global warming is a proof, if is not changeed how the idea is transposed into invention finished product everything is useless, -surpassing, the years it is only accessible to those who can juggle money from one up to many inventions ………….. , myself i m a proof for whosoever wants to probably, i hold a lot of ideas patentable in me necessary to the climate change, and can place on the market because i do not have the necessary money, many ideas arrive at them with money stolen from the net of those who don t have money, I have remained the same man who puts newspapers, a ball of nerves, do not wait for me then I will give you something, only those who want to work for the benefit of human society and their personal on secondary plan.
3. The religios problem means pride, …………….prists taxes, priests money, falsified Christianity
4. I’m tired to support miseries, working on effects, without working, changing on the causes and therefore I want to found a couple relationship (I’ll probably hurt someone?) I do not want apostolate and no grace only to be a simple man, to forget the idiocys, hypocrisies, …………, do not judge me for what I will do from now as a revolt.
wash your head with your global warming, ……………
este normal ca opinia publica sa dea raspuns la astfel de intrebari doar suntem tari si democratice?
cu cat inaintam in incalzirea globala vor trebui folosite dispozitive de coborat temperatura pamantului cine isi asuma resposabilitatea?
cu cit inaintam in incalzirea globala costurile vor fi mai mari din banii cui vor fi platite aceste costuri?
la ce preturi se vor tranzactiona aceste inventii?
in buzunarul cui vor intra acesti bani?
………………….
cat ar trebui coborata temperatura?
probabil pina la normalitatea ciclica, inlaturind efectele negative ale societatii umane?
problema este ca cu cat inaintam in incalzirea globala vor trebui folosite dispozitive de coborat temperatura pamantului
cine isi asuma resposabilitatea?
cu cit inaintam in incalzirea globala costurile vor fi mai mari
din banii cui vor fi platite aceste costuri?
2. inventia a apartinut din toteauna simplului mestesugar in legatura directa cu cerul, cu Dumnezeu, actual ea a fost furata din cadrul societatii umane, de la Dumnezeu (pentru ca Dumnezeu inseamna toti oamenii nu doar cei “privilegiati” financiar) prin taxe, …….., prin un intreg sistem birocratico financiar care impovareaza producatorii, mici producatori nemai avind acces la inventii,anii ea fiind accesibila doar celor care au bani si pot jongla de la una pina la foarte multe inventii,………….., daca nu se umbla la modul in care ideea este transpusa in inventie, in produs finit totul este inutil, incalzirea globala este o dovada, eu insumi sunt o dovada pentru ori cine vrea sa o probeze, detin o sumedenie de idei brevetabile in mine necesare schimbarilor climatice si nu pot sa le introduc pe piata pentru ca nu am banii necesari, multe dintre ele ajung la ccei cu bani furate de pe net de la cei care nu au bani, eu am ramas acelasi om care pune ziare, un bulgare de nervi, sa nu va mai asteptati de la mine ca am sa va mai dau ceva, doar celor care vor sa colaboreze in folosul societatii umane si a lor personal pe planul 2.
3. problema religioasa a mindriilor, ……………… si a taxelor preotesti, banilor preotilor, a crestinismului falsificat (voi mi-ati pus in circa obligatii de calugar nu sunt omul potrivit pentru asa ceva eu sunt un dezinvolt prin definitie, nu suport sa lucrez la patron, reparatia sta in esenta in greseala acelei intilniri ori ce alta discutie este inutila, in a trai cu ea in dragoste, va trebui sa gasesc un paleativ ca nimeni sa nu mai vina pe drumul meu si al ei probabil o vai rani pe ea nu este vina mea este vina cui a decis ca noi doi sa nu fim un cuplu)
4. m-am saturat sa suport mizerii ca efecte fara sa umblu la cauze, de aceea i-mi voi cauta o relatie de cuplu, (probabil voi rani pe cineva?) nu mai vreau apostolat si nici un har doar sa fiu un simplu om, sa uit idioteniile, ipocriziile, …………, sa nu ma judecati pentru ceea ce am sa fac de acuma ca revolta.
spalati-va pe cap cu incalzirea voastra globala, ……………